Graph-based comparison of executable objects

WebA software birthmark is a set of characteristics extracted from an executable program. It is difficult to remove by modifying the program binary and is specific enough to distinguish it from other programs. Software birthmark techniques are used to detect program theft by determining the similarity between two different programs. In this paper, we propose a … WebGraph-based methods have been used with great suc-cess in order to compare executable objects by Halvar Flake [5] as well as Carrera and Erd´elyi [1]. Recently, Halvar Flake has also been applied this to the analy-sis of malware [3]. Using these methods it is possible to gain information about the actual security prob-

αDiff: cross-version binary code similarity detection with DNN

Webthe common drawbacks of any static-based approaches. For example, gener-ating a graph from a packed executable does not re ect the real structure of the code at all. In addition to the type of analysis, the scalability of these approaches is also a ected by the employed graph comparison algorithm. Full graph comparison ii high speed fatal car crashes https://b2galliance.com

Automatic Library Version Identification, an Exploration of

http://actes.sstic.org/SSTIC05/Analyse_differentielle_de_binaires/SSTIC05-article-Flake-Graph_based_comparison_of_Executable_Objects.pdf WebMar 22, 2024 · Graph-based comparison of executable objects (english version). SSTIC, 5:1--3, 2005. Google Scholar; X. Hu, T.-c. Chiueh, and K. G. Shin. Large-scale malware indexing using function-call graphs. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, pages 611--620. ACM, 2009. WebThe call graph, which presents the calling relationships between functions, is a useful representation of a program that can aid understanding. For programs that do not use function pointers, the call graph can be extracted simply by parsing the program. However, for programs that use function pointers, call graph extraction is nontrivial. how many days in spring 2023

CiteSeerX — Graph-based comparison of executable objects

Category:SemDiff: Finding Semtic Differences in Binary Programs based …

Tags:Graph-based comparison of executable objects

Graph-based comparison of executable objects

Graph-based comparison of Executable Objects

WebOct 23, 2012 · A Method for Resilient Graph-based Comparison of Executable Objects Joonhyouk Jang Department of Computer Science and Engineering Seoul National … Webblocks as graph (of a very simple form) again, and construct an isomorphism in. much the same manner. 4.1 Selectors. A Selector is essentially just a mapping that, given a node …

Graph-based comparison of executable objects

Did you know?

WebStructural Comparison of Executable Objects 163 3.1 An executable as Graph of Graphs We analyze the executable by regarding it as a graph of graphs. This means … WebA method to construct an optimal isomorphism between the sets of instructions, sets of basic blocks and sets of functions in two differing but similar executables is presented, …

WebGraph-based comparison of Executable Objects (English Version) Thomas Dullien1 and Rolf Rolles2 1 Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum [email protected] 2 University of Technology in Florida WebOct 8, 2004 · The talk will explain the concepts behind SABRE BinDiff, a tool that uses a graph-theoretical approach to compare two executable objects. Different applications …

WebNov 17, 2024 · 略读文献:Graph-based Comparison of Executable Objects. 略读文献:BinHunt; 略读文献:Binary Function Clustering Using Semantic Hashes. 略读文 … WebNov 1, 2024 · Graph-based comparison of executable objects (english version) Article. Full-text available. Jan 2005; Thomas Dullien; Rolf Rolles; Résumé A method to construct an optimal isomorphism between ...

WebOct 1, 2011 · Thus, the graph-based comparison algorithm based on the block signatures and jump relations is accurate and effective in comparing executable objects. Discover the world's research 20+ million members

WebTo perform the non-string based comparison techniques mentioned in section II (i.e. all but the system by Tian et al.), we first need to construct the CFGs of all of the functions in the executable objects in question. This requires disassembling the objects and using knowledge of the instruction set and how many days in summer stardewWebOct 22, 2014 · Abstract: A method to heuristically construct an isomorphism between the sets of functions in two similar but differing versions of the same executable file is presented. Such an isomorphism has multiple practical applications, specifically the ability to detect programmatic changes between the two executable versions. high speed fat tire electric bikesWebMay 25, 2024 · Traditional methods focus on using platform-independent characteristic strands intersecting or control flow graph (CFG) matching to compute the similarity and have shortages in terms of efficiency and … how many days in sofiaWebGraph-based comparison of Executable Objects ... - Actes du SSTIC. EN. English Deutsch Français Español Português Italiano Român Nederlands Latina Dansk Svenska … how many days in spainWebThe general idea of the presented approach is the following : Given two exe-cutables, the graphs A and B are constructed. Then a number of ”fixedpoints” in the two graphs are … how many days in st augustine floridaWebNov 25, 2015 · Graph-based algorithms have been applied to the comparison of binaries, they are also based on the idea of finding isomorphic CFGs . Their work, however, focuses on finding differences between different versions of the same binary for malware analysis. ... Flake, H.: Structural comparison of executable objects (2004) Google Scholar … how many days in strasbourgWebGraph-based comparison of Executable Objects ( English Version ) T. Dullien, R. Rolles Published 2005 Computer Science Résumé A method to construct an optimal … how many days in taipei